A study by scientists at Imperial College London has revealed that antibodies against COVID-19 declined rapidly in the British population during the summer, suggesting protection after infection may not be long lasting and raising the prospect of waning immunity in the community, Reuters news agency reported on Tuesday.

Imperial College London scientists have tracked antibody levels in the British population following the first wave of COVID-19 infections in March and April 2020. The study found that antibody prevalence fell from 6% of the population around the end of June to just 4.4% in September 2020. That raises the prospect of decreasing population immunity ahead of a second wave of infections that has forced local lockdowns and restrictions in recent weeks.

According to the researchers, although immunity to COVID-19 is a complex and murky area and may be assisted by T cells, as well as B cells that can stimulate the quick production of antibodies following re-exposure to the virus, the experience of other coronaviruses suggested immunity might not be enduring.

Wendy Barclay, Head of Department of Infectious Disease at Imperial College London was quoted as telling reporters: "We can see the antibodies and we can see them declining and we know that antibodies on their own are quite protective. On the balance of evidence I would say, with what we know for other coronaviruses, it would look as if immunity declines away at the same rate as antibodies decline away, and that this is an indication of waning immunity at the population level."

Reportedly, those whose COVID-19 was confirmed with a gold standard PCR test had a less pronounced decline in antibodies, as compared to people who had been asymptomatic and unaware of their original infection. Also, there was no change in the levels of antibodies seen in healthcare workers, possibly due to repeated exposure to the virus.

Imperial's findings were released as a pre-print paper and have not yet been peer-reviewed.

Barclay said that the rapid waning of antibodies from infection did not necessarily have implications for the efficacy of vaccine candidates currently in clinical trials, adding, "A good vaccine may well be better than natural immunity."